<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lunascape Is Faster Than Firefox 3.5, Shows Latest Benchmark Tests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.addictivetips.com/internet-tips/lunascape-is-faster-than-firefox-35-shows-latest-benchmark-tests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.addictivetips.com/internet-tips/lunascape-is-faster-than-firefox-35-shows-latest-benchmark-tests/</link>
	<description>Tips, Freewares, Downloads, Reviews, And More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:45:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Karlmarx</title>
		<link>http://www.addictivetips.com/internet-tips/lunascape-is-faster-than-firefox-35-shows-latest-benchmark-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-16946</link>
		<dc:creator>Karlmarx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 14:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.addictivetips.com/windows-tips/lunascape-is-faster-than-firefox-35-shows-latest-benchmark-tests/#comment-16946</guid>
		<description>I tried it today and it&#039;s actually great. I&#039;m not that type who always switch with browsers (I stayed only in Firefox) but I think I can get the hang of staying at Lunascape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried it today and it&#8217;s actually great. I&#8217;m not that type who always switch with browsers (I stayed only in Firefox) but I think I can get the hang of staying at Lunascape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beam</title>
		<link>http://www.addictivetips.com/internet-tips/lunascape-is-faster-than-firefox-35-shows-latest-benchmark-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-12664</link>
		<dc:creator>Beam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.addictivetips.com/windows-tips/lunascape-is-faster-than-firefox-35-shows-latest-benchmark-tests/#comment-12664</guid>
		<description>@Ray You are an idiot. You must change your attitude dude...Lunascape is great, (in fact I am a lover of Firefox) and you have to agree it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ray You are an idiot. You must change your attitude dude&#8230;Lunascape is great, (in fact I am a lover of Firefox) and you have to agree it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.addictivetips.com/internet-tips/lunascape-is-faster-than-firefox-35-shows-latest-benchmark-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-4838</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.addictivetips.com/windows-tips/lunascape-is-faster-than-firefox-35-shows-latest-benchmark-tests/#comment-4838</guid>
		<description>Why do we need one more useless browser? By useless I mean there is chrome and safari out there if you want webkit browser. For most of Firefox users those javascript tests means much less then the functionality that Firefox addons provides you with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do we need one more useless browser? By useless I mean there is chrome and safari out there if you want webkit browser. For most of Firefox users those javascript tests means much less then the functionality that Firefox addons provides you with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

