Chrome Extensions v.s Firefox Add-ons: Why You Should Migrate?

You would have noticed that we have started reviewing extensions for Google Chrome as well. What was to be a quick testing, turned out to be a non-stop reviews for extensions. The only reason users were stuck with Firefox was add-ons and now they have no reason to stay.

Google Chrome Extensions are far more light-weight and responsive when compared with Firefox. Also one of the most annoying part of Firefox was to restart the browser every time a new extension was installed, disabled, or uninstalled. Google Chrome however never requires any restart.

The latest developer version 4.0.2 of Chrome supports extensions and it’s time to migrate. If you are a novice users, it is recommended that you wait till the next public version of Google Chrome comes out.

Slowly over time, the developers behind the popular add-ons for Firefox are releasing extensions for Google Chrome as well. It is a matter of time before everyone starts changing their default web browser. ;)

  • Share this article!

    • Digg this!
    • Bookmark on Reddit
    • Bookmark at Delicious
    • Stumble this!
    • Share this post at Facebook
    • Tweet this!
    • Share on Yahoo! Buzz
    • Add AddictiveTips to your Technorati favorites
    • Share on Friendfeed
This entry was posted in Internet and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

22 Comments

  1. Posted December 8, 2009 at 10:16 am | Permalink

    I won't be changing to Chrome anytime soon. I can't stand the way it looks. It's hideous, I just can't stand it.

  2. Sheikums
    Posted December 8, 2009 at 11:27 am | Permalink

    I always thought chrome extensions are more like userscripts and Stylish scripts? I'm probably wrong.

  3. redapple
    Posted December 8, 2009 at 11:45 am | Permalink

    i dont see any reason why should migrate – chrome extensions are lame comparing to firefox ones, and yes… theyre more like userscripts.

    if i would migrate after all i would choose SRWare Iron than Google Chrome with their spyware-like s*t

  4. Posted December 8, 2009 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    I agree in the context of, if I were to choose Chrome, I would go with a version based on Chromium rather than the one put out by Google. Other versions have more options and do not collect statistics like Google does.

  5. Adrianne
    Posted December 8, 2009 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    I switched to Chrome for about three months, working with the developers build. I am back on Firefox. Chrome is a nice streamlined system, and I miss the lack of resource hogging, but in the end, Firefox just gave me what I was looking for in terms of customization. Everyone uses their browser in a different way, and Chrome just can't replace some of my favorite addons. Not to mention that Chrome had a problem loading my online classroom.

  6. Posted December 8, 2009 at 3:18 pm | Permalink

    My only answer for your complain about firefox's addons is: https://jetpack.mozillalabs.com/

  7. kwanbis
    Posted December 8, 2009 at 5:22 pm | Permalink

    What you mean by “resource hogging”? If anything, chrome uses MANY times the memory that firefox uses.

  8. metmet
    Posted December 8, 2009 at 5:30 pm | Permalink

    don't migrate to chrome because it will not have as many extensions as firefox add ons. Plus this is more than just addons. We have to consider security and reliability. Im sticking to firefox because i support their cause and i need the adblock addon. I can't imagine how many flash ads i see using chrome or any other browser.

  9. dhanush
    Posted December 8, 2009 at 8:13 pm | Permalink

    btw i think u didn't check the new chrome extensions…………
    they have a addon similar to adblock known as adblock+
    and they have flashblock also to block the flash

  10. Posted December 8, 2009 at 11:12 pm | Permalink

    I jumped back to Chrome after testing shortly after it's release. WOW I LOVE THIS NOW

  11. Joshua
    Posted December 8, 2009 at 11:41 pm | Permalink

    You really jumped the gun on that one. Chrome extensions are very limited and to be quite honest, they just suck. I tried using an ad block extension and it added a toolbar with an advertisement to the bottom of the browser. Talk about being counterproductive and hypocritical.

    I agree with Vordreller, Chrome is hideous. I find the whole feel of the browser is off for me. I suppose I'm to use to Firefox (with Windows 7 look). I really don't see any reason to switch.

    Firefox works perfect, with the help of extensions it: blocks all advertisements and popups, has in browser screenshot editing, fits in well with Windows 7 ( http://countedfor.deviantart.com/art/Windows-7-... ), among many other reasons I don't feel like listing.

  12. Nakodari
    Posted December 9, 2009 at 1:21 am | Permalink

    Chrome has Adblock extensions as well.

  13. Posted December 9, 2009 at 4:12 am | Permalink

    I jumped back to Chrome after testing shortly after it's release. WOW I LOVE THIS NOW

  14. Joshua
    Posted December 9, 2009 at 4:41 am | Permalink

    You really jumped the gun on that one. Chrome extensions are very limited and to be quite honest, they just suck. I tried using an ad block extension and it added a toolbar with an advertisement to the bottom of the browser. Talk about being counterproductive and hypocritical.

    I agree with Vordreller, Chrome is hideous. I find the whole feel of the browser is off for me. I suppose I'm to use to Firefox (with Windows 7 look). I really don't see any reason to switch.

    Firefox works perfect, with the help of extensions it: blocks all advertisements and popups, has in browser screenshot editing, fits in well with Windows 7 ( http://countedfor.deviantart.com/art/Windows-7-... ), among many other reasons I don't feel like listing.

  15. Nakodari
    Posted December 9, 2009 at 6:21 am | Permalink

    Chrome has Adblock extensions as well.

  16. Posted December 9, 2009 at 9:12 am | Permalink

    I jumped back to Chrome after testing shortly after it's release. WOW I LOVE THIS NOW

  17. Joshua
    Posted December 9, 2009 at 9:41 am | Permalink

    You really jumped the gun on that one. Chrome extensions are very limited and to be quite honest, they just suck. I tried using an ad block extension and it added a toolbar with an advertisement to the bottom of the browser. Talk about being counterproductive and hypocritical.

    I agree with Vordreller, Chrome is hideous. I find the whole feel of the browser is off for me. I suppose I'm to use to Firefox (with Windows 7 look). I really don't see any reason to switch.

    Firefox works perfect, with the help of extensions it: blocks all advertisements and popups, has in browser screenshot editing, fits in well with Windows 7 ( http://countedfor.deviantart.com/art/Windows-7-... ), among many other reasons I don't feel like listing.

  18. Nakodari
    Posted December 9, 2009 at 11:21 am | Permalink

    Chrome has Adblock extensions as well.

  19. gmillerguy
    Posted January 13, 2010 at 6:59 pm | Permalink

    I have tried to use chrome but it doesn't even display the rich-text editor in ebay. I constantly run across pages with forms that won't submit properly, I think because of chrome's ability to use AJAX consistently.
    I do like several of the extensions for chrome and love the ability to install without a restart, etc. But the extensions for chrome do mostly suck compared to many firefox plugins. Bookmarking, RSS, and Search engine addons are also better on firefox IMO. As each release of Firefox since 3.0 gets slimmer as they get rid of some changes they made to the code base in 2.5, it will get faster and faster on the restart.
    Plus, as a developer I find the code inspector in chrome to be totally insufficient compared to Firebug. Chrome has firebug light, but it is a pile.

  20. Posted May 16, 2010 at 12:20 pm | Permalink

    No way! Firefox is better.

  21. Firefox is old
    Posted July 17, 2010 at 9:40 pm | Permalink

    Firefox was great when it came out, but it’s getting slower and slower all the time, and the developers are becoming freetarded to the point of making the user experience suck.

    I’m trying Chrome and it’s very nice. It feels unfinished, but it kicks Firefox’s ass in a number of ways.

  22. hema
    Posted July 24, 2010 at 2:10 pm | Permalink

    I came across your article and its interesting.I believe a big reason to stick to firefox is the addons for every thing you may like to do on a webpage. If only they can tweak the speed issue a bit, FF will be undisputedly the best one.I use chrome for heavy pages (like games etc.) as its a bit faster..but when it comes to productivity i will certainly go with FF.In fact All of chrome’s popular extensions are available in Firefox. A nice list has been compiled at
    http://indigic.com/2010/07/firefox-addons-matching-google-chromes-favorite-extensions/
    I found it useful. Also if you like look and feel of Chrome you can make FF look like chrome using the following guide by lifehacker..
    http://lifehacker.com/5044518/enable-chromes-best-features-in-firefox
    I will suggest to use both to squeeze the best of both worlds untill we have a clear winner..cheers!!!

5 Trackbacks

  1. By Firefox v.s Chrome Extensions: What We Learned So Far on December 11, 2009 at 10:40 pm

    [...] few days back I wrote a post Why You Should Migrate to Chrome, I was wrong. It must be absurd to compare Firefox extensions with that of Chrome, but even though [...]

  2. [...] Chrome Extensions v.s Firefox Add-ons: Why You Should Migrate?; [...]

  3. [...] Chrome Extensions v.s Firefox Add-ons: Why You Should Migrate?; [...]

  4. [...] Chrome Extensions v.s Firefox Add-ons: Why You Should Migrate?; [...]

  5. [...] few days back I wrote a post Why You Should Migrate to Chrome, I was wrong. It must be absurd to compare Firefox extensions with that of Chrome, but even though [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


More in Internet (5 of 5 articles)